data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/829ad/829ad529db464453cf988301e9d99a11168d4dc4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b888/6b8884a45be8ef3039423c955333344b450ff2ed" alt=""
I recently read
this review of of
Fever, a novel by Mary Beth Keane about Typhoid Mary. As I read, a memory nagged at me. Hadn't I just read a book about Typhoid Mary? Of course, I couldn't think of the name. But why wasn't any other book being mentioned in the review? Finally, it came to me:
Deadly by Julie Chibbaro.
Deadly is told from the point of view of a young woman who works in the health department, tracking the typhoid epidemic. So why wasn't it mentioned in the review? I would suggest because
Deadly is a
young adult novel rather than just a novel. What a shame, as it is an excellent book, and anyone interested in
Fever would be interested in
Deadly too. While labeling books as children's or young adult is supposed to provide a helpful guideline, it can too often do the opposite - prevent people from reading wonderful books. Have you noticed any instances where reviewers of adult books overlooked children's or young adult books?
No comments:
Post a Comment